Q: Could the Colorado delta have been this possible
Aztlán site?
A: Well, the Colorado delta is a region that was unstable in many ways.
There were a number of different periods in which the Colorado River filled
the delta up. Up to that time, the Gulf of California extended all the
way to Indio, and in fact, almost to Palm Springs. One can still see the
remains of it in the Palms Springs area, and all along the rocks there
you can see the shores of the old Gulf of California. But the Colorado
River kept dumping its silt into whats known as the delta region,
around Mexicali, and so the Mexicali area is tilted upward and theres
a river that goes through there called the Rio Hardy, H-a-r-d-y, and that
river still sometimes at high tide, can move to the north as well as to
the south. It would only take a few feet difference for the Gulf of California
to actually be able to move back into the Salton Basin, even today. But
at several different times, there were earthquakes or other seismic activity
in the area, and the delta was depressed, and the Gulf of California re-entered
the Basin. And then there were periods in which the delta was raised by
the activity of the Colorado River, or even seismic activity, and the
Basin was cut off again. Now, you have to remember that the Gulf of California,
when it became cut off, the northern part remained saline, so it was not
a fresh water lake. Because of the high salinity in the area, even though
the recent Salt and Sea gets fresh water from the Colorado River and from
irrigation runoff, which maintains it today, its still saline. Because
of the thousands of years in which it was the Gulf of California. So I
think the main feature is the Gulf of California going to the north. Any
freshwater lakes in the area would be transient and fairly short-lived,
such as the present Salt and Sea, which has only been there since around
1902, as I recall, when the irrigation dykes broke. So I think that the
delta is not a good place to envision a major cultural development.
However, in my research for my book Warriors of the Colorado, I did find
a reference to pueblo-type ruins in the delta area. Now they have never
been found by any archeologists. I only had the documentary reference
to these pueblo-type ruins. They were in the area occupied by the Hyaguama
people, who were a people living between Yuma and the Cocopa area, which
is a little bit farther down the delta. And in that region, which is basically
a desert wash-type environment, but with many channels of the Colorado
River providing rich growth, so theres plenty of water underground.
But its still kind of a desert type environment. In that area, apparently,
at one time, there was a pueblo. But as I say, the ruins, apparently,
have never been discovered by modern archeologists. There is also an account
of an old structure up near the Blythe area. But how old that was, I cant
say from the documentary evidence. However, that may refer, you see, to
the Soba, or Sivani people going first to the Colorado River before they
turned and went to the east. [It] probably does not indicate a very large
pueblo-type population because otherwise, the ruins would have almost
certainly been discovered a number of times. A lot of cowboys in the area,
you know, Indian cowboys and so on moving cattle all through the delta
and so on. So, I think it probably would have been found again, if it
were large.
So the delta seems to have emerged barrier around 900 to 1400 A.D. and
at that particular time, the Colorado River was deflected to the north.
And was flowing into what is now the Salton Basin. Some people call it
Lake Cahuilla, during that period of time, although we dont know
that the Cahuilla people, who were necessarily living around at least
the southern part of it, but probably up around the northern part. In
any event, gradually, as the delta emerged higher, the Colorado River
deflected itself, again, towards the Gulf of California, and Lake Cahuilla
dried up. Of course it dried somewhat slowly, but if people had moved
to the shores to live off of the fish and so on that might have been trapped
in there, it is possible that the drying up of the lake would have been
a catastrophe that could have caused people to move. On the other hand,
the archeology of the region doesnt, as far as I know, indicate
any connections with a Meso-American type people. Of course, we dont
know what the culture of the Aztecas would have been [like] at that particular
time.
There are theories on the part of anthropologists, that whats known
as the Numic, or Shoshonean branch of the Uto-Aztecan family, had its
hearth, or its origin, development area in southern California, and that
the Shoshone and the Paiute and other divisions migrated to the north
and northeast from that hearth in southern California. That, of course,
would relate to the Hopi, since the Hopi speak a Numic language. Now whether
thats really true or not, Im not sure, because in the late
historic period, we find that the Shoshone, for instance, are--and the
Comanche, who are also the same as Shoshone, really--are living as far
north as Wyoming, and even across the Canadian border in what is now known
as Saskatchewan. And, of course, then down through the whole of Utah and
the western Colorado area, as well. So to have gotten all those people
migrating all the way up to Saskatchewan from southern California, I find
a little bit hard to accept, and I think that mistakes can be made, sometimes,
when one theorizes where one particular language family originates.
In any case, its likely that there have been a number of movements
in the area. And were not just yet sure, which directions they traveled.
Q: In what way is Chicomoztoc archetypal of Native American origin stories,
the concept of coming from the Earth?
A: There are many origin stories that are found in Meso-America. Among
them Maya, for example, and other groups in the Yucatan area, as well
as among many people of Central Mexico. They tend to have certain features
in common. One of the origin features thats very important is the
concept of seven caves.
Seven caves is often associated with a place known as Nonohualco, which
is probably located, originally, in southern Vera Cruz, or in Tabasco
province on the Gulf of Mexico. Zoiva is another place thats very
frequently mentioned, especially by the Maya, and Chicomoztoc also appears,
very frequently. And it appears that a great many of the peoples who eventually
became important in the Valley of Mexico, particularly, wanted to graft
onto their genealogies, references to these different places. So that
we have to be a little careful. While seven caves, obviously, is something
very important, Im not sure we know where the seven caves would
be. Because the concept would be borrowed by many different peoples to
assert their ancestry.
An example of this are the Pudapache people of Michoacan, who apparently
in one of their chronicles, as recorded by Europeans, referred to being
of Chichimec ancestry, or the Chichimecos. And many groups also bring
in the Chichimecos. The Telascaltecos bring in the Chichimecos, and so
on. But the Pudapache language seems to be closest, if any, to any languages
of the Andes. And so its very likely that they came by sea along
the west coast of Mexico, and entered the Rio del Balsas and up into Michoacan,
that way. And so, its not too likely that they really are of Chichimec
ancestry.
But, nonetheless, some of the people in Michoacan may have been of Chichimec
background. Or they chose to borrow this general tradition in the Valley
of Mexico and graft it on to their tradition, which otherwise might have
become a little bit obscure, having come so far, such a great, great distance
in their migrations. So I think Chicomoztoc and seven caves are very important.
But we have to be careful about making them essential ingredients of following
a specific path. I think they are archetypal references to points that
are of importance for all the people of the Valley of Mexico. Theyre
part of a common kind of racial history.
Q: Could egrets have been in the Sun Valley, in the Phoenix area?
A: Before it got drained, the Gila and the Salt River could well have
had basins where there was plant life and so on growing that would have
attracted egrets. We have egrets around Davis here, you know. And I think,
what weve discovered in the last few years is that when you have
water being revived in an area, even though it hasnt been there
for awhile, the egrets will come. So, I think that one would have to go
into the biological literature on the distribution of egrets and other
complicated things that we dont have the resources to do right now,
at least I dont.
I suspect that the Gila probably had a lot more ponds and lagoons and
so on along it, in those days, because the agriculture that the white
people have carried on, the mining upstream and everything else, has undoubtedly
silted the channel and changed it considerably. Its undoubtably
full of gravel and debris. That didnt formally exist I would guess.
So, I wouldnt rule it out, the possibility that it would have egrets,
too.
Q: Going back to that pueblo that has been alluded to in documentary evidence
but has never been found--
A: OK. OK. Let me see if I can find that, specifically. Theres no
doubt that the river Yumans shared a number of traits with Hohokoms. The
Oodham also shared traits with the Hohokoms. And some people believe
that the Oodham culture is a derivative of Hohokom. But Di Peso,
an archeologist that worked in the area for many many years, suggests
the Oodham were the indigenous people of southern Arizona, that
the Hohokoms were intruders from Mexico. According to Di Peso, the early
Hohokom culture, up to about a thousand A.D., [who were] a group of immigrants
from Mexico, known archeologically as the Hohokom, entered the Pimeria
Alta with a recognizably different material culture complex, and took
over a number of river valleys, such as the middle Gila and the Salt.
They extended their dominion throughout Pimeria Alta. The Hohokom also
had colonies up as far as Flagstaff, about the year 1070, and, as I mentioned,
their pottery has been found along the Colorado River, and even in the
San Fernando Valley, California, where I found some, at Tonga. It was
traded that far, so the Hohokom might be worth mentioning, since they
did have the ball courts and the extensive irrigation systems and they
illustrate the close contact with Mexico.
|